Paid search engine bid management
Paid Search Engine Tools, LLCPatent 7,043,450 (the '450 patent) has been asserted by Paid Search Engine Tools, LLC against Microsoft Corp. and Google, Inc. in federal district court alleging patent infringement. The '450 patent pertains to a system for monitoring keyword bids across one or more search engines so that that marketers can make adjustments to their pay-per-click bids. This patent may impact any party that is in the business of selling keywords for advertising and marketing. The challenge is to determine whether the patent is valid.
Last updated: about 1 year ago
Summary / Description
| Summary / Description | (1) Abstract - The present invention provides for a method of updatig an internet search engine database with the results of a user's selection of specific web page listings from the general web page listing provided to the user as a result of his initial keyword search entry. By updating the database with the selections of many different users, the database can be updated to prioritize those web listings that have been selected the most with respect to a given keyword, and thereby presenting first the most popular web page listings in a subsequent search using the same keyword search entry. |
Basic Information
| Type of Prior Art | Issued Patents - US |
| Country | United States of America |
| Patent/Application # | 6421675 |
| Kind Code | United States (US) - United STATES Patent - A |
| Patentee Name | Assignee: GlobalBrain.net Inc. |
| Relevant Pages, Columns, or Lines | (1) Abstract; (2) col. 7, ln 1 |
| URL | http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/... |
| Publication Date | July 15, 1998 |
| Additional Information | Date listed is filing date |
Notes / To Do
| Notes | |
Excerpt
(2) col. 7, ln 1-20 - Input data set Output data set All web-page developers information New web-page list (permanent) about web address and key-words Content Provider's list: This is a list (associated with each key-word) of content providers which must typically [that] pay to illustrate content with the key-word. The price paid is dependent on the number of other content providers, the amount they spend and the number of times the key word is searched for.
Input data set Output data set Key-word Content Providers list - a list of Content Provider's bids for content content associated with each spots key-word permanent) High-flyers hit-list: This a list of web-pages (associated with every keyword) that are increasing in popularity at the highest rate. It is an indication of how rapidly web-pages are rising up the users' choice hit-list and it is used as a means to ensure that new emerging web-pages rise to the top of the users' choice hit-list.
(3) col. 31, ln 16-37 - Keyword content data table 804 is illustrated in more detail in Table 12 below, and its characteristics are: H is the cumulative number or hits for one time period for the keyword. This is the number of times people choose that keyword; N is the number of times particular content 900 that is associated with a keyword has been sent out for display. This is not necessarily the same as H since content associated with a profile type may be have a different selection factor than content associated with the keyword. Tis selection factor can be various variables, such as votes or price; A is the selection factor for the keyword from each content provider (e.g. a selection factor could be a $ bid to be associated with that keyword); T is the total of the selection factors for each keyword and is the sum of A's; and P is the content value, as determined by votes or price, for each keyword and is T/N (e.g. this could be the $ per time content is sent out with that key word--this is a price of being associated with that key word)
(4) col. 34, ln 37 - col. 35, ln 52 - When bidding for content 902, content providers select a keyword or profile to target their content from Tables 12 & 13. The search engine indicates automatically the number of times this search has been performed for the previous time period (H), the number of times items of content were sent out associated with that selection (N) and the value of the content P.
The new content provider then enters the selection factor A and the system can then instantly calculate the new value (P) based on the new total bids (T). The advertiser can also be told the number of views per month they are likely to get for their bid (N*(A/T)). These changes are calculated in real-time to give the new content provider an indication of how their bid will influence the value and the views they will receive for their bid. If a value and number of views are agreeable to the advertiser they can choose to submit it as a bid for the defined period, such as a day, week, or month, for instance. The details of other content providers are, preferably, not made public. Content providers may also enter a maximum value M they can pant with for their content. This provides content providers with some security against paying too much if the value changes. If the value goes too high then a content provider's bid can drop off the list (if P is greater than M then A is not counted as a bid for that particular content provider). The bid would go back on the list if the value went down again, thus acting as a stabilizing mechanism. The content provider can, in a preferred embodiment, be notified by e-mail if their content 902 has dropped off the list due to their value limit M. . .
Relevance
Claims
Managing an offeror's offer for a keyword
A method of managing an offeror's offer for a keyword made to a search engine, said offer identifying an amount said offeror will pay upon a searcher's use of an offeror-supplied reference located upon the keyword within said search engine, comprising receiving an authorization from said offeror, after receipt of said authorization, monitoring keyword offers at one or more Internet search engines to identify a change in said offeror's offer of interest to said offeror, and implementing said change in said offeror's offer on behalf of said offeror based upon the previously received authorization without further intervention of said offeror.
Relevance
References 1-4 above
References 1-4 above
Claim Chart
All
Second method for managing offers for keywords
A method of managing offers for a keyword made to a search engine, said offers identifying an amount an offeror will pay upon a searcher's use of an offeror-supplied reference located using the keyword within said search engine, comprising presenting adjacently-ranked authorized payment amounts for a plurality of target keywords at one or more Internet search engines on a single display screen, each keyword comprising one or more words, in a manner that distinctively identifies one or more selected authorized payments of interest.
Relevance
References 1-4 above
References 1-4 above
Claim Chart
All
Managing offers for a keyword
A method of managing offers for a keyword made to a search engine, said offers identifying an amount an offeror will pay upon a searcher's use of an offeror-supplied reference located using the keyword within said search engine, comprising accumulating adjacently-ranked authorized payment amounts for a plurality of target keywords, each target keyword comprising one or more words, each authorized payment amount representing an offeror's authorized payment for one of said keywords at one or more Internet search engines, and presenting the adjacently-ranked authorized payment amounts for a plurality of target keywords on a single display screen to a user.
Relevance
References 1-4 above
References 1-4 above
Claim Chart
All


